Venue: Council Chamber, County Offices, Newland, Lincoln LN1 1YL. View directions
Contact: Steve Blagg
Democratic Services Officer
Items
| No. |
Item |
1. |
Apologies/Membership Changes
Minutes:
Apologies for
absence were received from Councillors I G Fleetwood and C
Matthews.
|
2. |
Declarations of Members' Interests
Minutes:
No declarations
were made at this stage of the meeting.
|
3. |
Minutes of the previous meeting of the Statement of Public Rights of Way and Definitive Map Sub Committee held on 7 November 2016 for information only  PDF 113 KB
Minutes:
Officers stated
that the minutes before the meeting were there for information only
as the membership of the Committee had changed considerably since
the meeting on 7 November 2016.
|
4. |
Appeals against the prioritisation of Definitive Map Modification Orders PDF 2 MB
Additional documents:
Minutes:
|
Application
|
Current Priority
|
Decision
|
Reason for
Decision
|
|
(Note: Councillor T R Ashton
requested that a note should be made in the minutes that he was the
portfolio holder for Planning at East Lindsey District Council)
Appeal Against the
prioritisation of DMMO No. 389: Woodhall Spa – Alleged public footpath
between Stixwould Road and King Edward
Crescent
|
147
|
(a) Current position
of No. 147 to be retained.
(b) That it was
preferable to keep the current northern route of PF 159 through
Jubilee Park (behind the cricket pavilion) to any southern
route.
|
It was agreed that
the request did not meet any of the "exception" criteria because
the proposed new housing development which was likely to lead to an
increase in the number of pupils on roll at the St Andrew's CE
Primary School were unlikely to use the DMMO 389 route
|
|
(Note: Councillor H Spratt requested
that a note should be made in the minutes that he knew Parish
Councillor Alexander Maughan)
Appeal against the prioritisation of
DMMO 352: Long Bennington – Alleged footpath between
Wheatsheaf Lane and Kirton Lane
|
126
|
Move up the
prioritisation list to No.13 in accordance with "exception
criteria" No. 2
|
Planning application
approved by District Council which showed that the erection of a
double garage could affect the route of the alleged footpath. Also,
the District Council's advice that "in the event that the DMMO was
approved and a PROW designated before the development started, it
would be possible for the applicant to apply to the District
Council to make an amendment to the planning permission to move the
position of the garage so that the PROW would not be
obstructed"
|
|
Appeal against the
prioritisation of DMMO 375: Cranwell
and Byard's Lane – Addition of Public Footpath No. 754 and
Public Bridleway 1
|
139
|
Move up the
prioritisation list to No. 14 in accordance with "exception
criteria" No 1
|
In view of the
recorded hostility within the community and mapping history of the
footpath
|
|
Translate